In an innovative move to address infrastructure challenges, Tennessee lawmakers have introduced the "Pot for Potholes Act," a legislative proposal aimed at legalizing cannabis to generate revenue for road repairs and other infrastructure projects. This initiative reflects a growing trend among states exploring alternative funding mechanisms by tapping into the burgeoning cannabis industry. As of February 2025, the bill is under consideration in the Tennessee General Assembly, sparking discussions on its potential economic and social impacts. 

‍

The "Pot for Potholes Act" Explained 

Introduced by Representative Aftyn Behn, the "Pot for Potholes Act" seeks to legalize the retail sale of marijuana for adults aged 21 and over. The bill outlines comprehensive regulations for the cultivation, processing, and distribution of cannabis within the state. A significant feature of the proposal is its taxation framework: a 15% excise tax on all cannabis sales, with the generated revenue earmarked specifically for infrastructure improvements. According to the bill, 75% of the tax revenue would be allocated to the state's highway fund, with a fifth equally distributed among Tennessee counties. The remaining 5% is designated for administrative costs, including enforcement of the new regulations.  

As of mid-February 2025, the "Pot for Potholes Act" is progressing through the legislative process. It has been introduced in both the House and Senate and is currently under review by the respective committees. The proposal has ignited a robust debate among lawmakers, stakeholders, and the public, with discussions focusing on the potential economic benefits, public health implications, and societal impacts of cannabis legalization. 

Cannabis Tax Revenue in Other States

The experience of other states provides valuable insights into the potential financial benefits of cannabis legalization. As of August 2024, 21 states have implemented cannabis taxation, collectively generating substantial revenue. In 2023 alone, these states reported a combined total of more than $2.9 billion in cannabis excise tax revenue.  ‍

Several states have emerged as top performers in terms of revenue generation: 

• Washington: With a 37% retail excise tax, Washington collected approximately $460.3 million in cannabis excise tax revenue in 2023, accounting for 1.23% of the state's total tax revenue.  
  ‍
• Colorado: Implementing a 15% excise tax on retail sales, Colorado amassed around $263 million in 2023, representing 1.33% of its total tax revenue.  
  ‍
• Illinois: In 2024, Illinois achieved over $2 billion in total cannabis sales, marking a fourth consecutive year of record-breaking figures since legalizing adult-use cannabis five years ago. This included $1.7 billion from adult-use sales and more than $285 million from medical cannabis sales. The state's tax revenue from cannabis dispensaries exceeded $490 million.  

These figures underscore the significant revenue potential that regulated cannabis markets can offer to state economies. 

‍

Allocation of Cannabis Tax Revenue 

The utilization of cannabis tax revenue varies across states, with funds often directed toward public services and community development. Common allocations include education, public health initiatives, infrastructure projects, and programs aimed at rectifying the adverse effects of past drug policies. For example:

• Colorado: A portion of Colorado's cannabis tax revenue is allocated to the Building Excellent Schools Today (BEST) program, which funds the construction and renovation of public schools. Additionally, funds support substance abuse prevention and treatment programs. 
  ‍
• Illinois: Illinois directs a significant share of its cannabis tax revenue toward communities disproportionately impacted by the War on Drugs. The state's Restore, Reinvest, and Renew (R3) Program funds initiatives related to economic development, violence prevention, and youth development in these areas.  
  ‍
• California: California allocates cannabis tax revenue to various programs, including childcare for low-income families, public safety grants, and environmental restoration projects affected by illegal cannabis cultivation. 

These allocation strategies highlight the versatility of cannabis tax revenue in addressing diverse state-specific needs and priorities. 

Potential Impact on Tennessee 

If enacted, the "Pot for Potholes Act" could have a transformative impact on Tennessee's infrastructure and public services. The state's infrastructure has been a growing concern, with significant funding shortfalls hindering maintenance and development projects. The infusion of cannabis tax revenue could provide a much-needed financial boost to address these challenges. 

Drawing parallels from other states, Tennessee could anticipate substantial economic benefits: 

• Revenue Generation: Based on the performance of states with similar populations and tax structures, Tennessee could project significant annual revenue from cannabis sales. For instance, Michigan, with a population of approximately 10 million, collected over $1 billion in adult-use cannabis tax revenues through 2023.  
  ‍
• Infrastructure Funding: Allocating 75% of cannabis tax revenue to the highway fund, as proposed, would directly support road repairs and improvements, potentially reducing the state's $78 billion infrastructure funding shortfall.  
  ‍
• Economic Development: The legalization of cannabis could stimulate job creation in agriculture, retail, and ancillary industries, contributing to overall economic growth. 

Expert projections suggest that, with effective implementation, Tennessee could replicate or even surpass the successes observed in other states, leading to improved infrastructure, and enhanced public services. 

‍

Challenges and Considerations 

While the potential benefits are significant, Tennessee may face several challenges in implementing cannabis legalization: 

‍

Regulatory Framework

Establishing a robust regulatory system to oversee cultivation, distribution, and retail operations will be crucial in preventing issues such as illicit market activity, quality control concerns, and compliance violations. Many states, including California and Oregon, have struggled with oversupply and regulatory loopholes that have led to black-market sales. 

‍

Public Opinion and Political Resistance

While national attitudes toward cannabis legalization have shifted, Tennessee remains a traditionally conservative state where opposition to marijuana reform is still prevalent. Lawmakers and constituents who prioritize public safety and moral concerns may resist the initiative. Past efforts to introduce medical marijuana legislation have faced significant pushback, which could indicate an uphill battle for broader legalization. 

Law Enforcement and Public Safety

Some opponents argue that legalizing marijuana could increase DUI incidents and create enforcement challenges. States with legal cannabis have implemented stringent impaired-driving laws, but Tennessee would need to invest in law enforcement training and testing protocols to address concerns. 

‍

Federal Hurdles

While more states continue to legalize cannabis, marijuana remains federally illegal under the Controlled Substances Act. This creates banking and financial barriers, as cannabis-related businesses often struggle to access traditional financial institutions due to federal restrictions. 

‍

Impact on Existing Industries

Some agricultural and pharmaceutical stakeholders in Tennessee may have concerns about how cannabis legalization could affect their respective markets. The alcohol and pharmaceutical industries have historically lobbied against marijuana reform in various states due to concerns over market competition. 

‍

Final Thoughts on Tennessee's Pot for Potholes Act

As Tennessee continues to debate the merits of the "Pot for Potholes Act," one thing is clear — marijuana legalization is no longer just a countercultural movement but a legitimate policy consideration with tangible financial benefits. Whether or not Tennessee follows in the footsteps of states like Colorado, Illinois, and Michigan remains to be seen, but the conversation has officially begun. 

‍